The third error that we can find in the mantic worksheet provided to the school-age child is what we encounter with educatee C an in sodding(a) respond to the paradox . While solving the problem , savant C has appargonntly overlooked the last digit assuming 3 as a equilibrium while the solution is non complete in itself . This occurs due to negligence As per student C s problem evaluation , student C event chasten direction when it comes to solving the portional sums . However , the quotient of the division sum provided is uncompleted and the cause of the remainder is not 3 . In this oddball , both the quotient and the remainder are legal injury . 8222 separate by 7 equals 1174 with a remainder 4 and not what student C has stated (quotient as 117 with a remainder 3In to verify separately error made by each student , it is essential to proceed step-by-step checking the student s problem evaluation strategy . In to know whether the student s answer with regards to the problem posed for solving is right or defile (since this is division , double-checking is the best method to verify .
some other method to check whether the divisional sum s quotient and remainder are right or wrong is to multiply the quotient with the dividend and then add the remainder to it . This would give the divisor . All the errors of the students can be verified by the methods outlined aboveIn to correct student A s error , student A should be fluent in multiplication tables and this means thorough memorizing learner ! B makes a methodological error the concept of division should be rewrite with student B so that the mistake is avoided in the future(a) Student C should practice more of divisional sums as he or she is in the process of neglecting the numbers...If you want to fit a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.